On Argumentation-Based Negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Interactions are a core part of all multi-agent systems. They occur because of the inter-dependencies which inevitably exist between the agents and they manifest themselves in many different forms—including cooperation, coordination, collaboration. However perhaps the most fundamental and powerful mechanism for managing these inter-agent dependencies at run-time is negotiation—the process by which a group of agents communicate with one to try and come to a mutually acceptable agreement on some matter. Negotiation underpins attempts to cooperate and coordinate (both between artificial and human agents) and is required both when the agents are self interested and when they are cooperative. It is so central precisely because the agents are autonomous. For an agent to influence an acquaintance, the acquaintance needs to be convinced that it should act in a particular way. The means of achieving this state are to make proposals, trade options, offer concessions, and (hopefully) come to a mutually acceptable agreement. In short, to negotiate.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Argumentation- and Proposal-Based Negotiation
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for c...
متن کاملA formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
This paper proposes an abstract framework for argumentation-based negotiation in which the impact of exchanging arguments on agents’ theories is formally described, the different types of solutions in negotiation are investigated, and the added value of argumentation in negotiation dialogues is analyzed. We study when, how and to which extent an exchange of arguments can be beneficial in negoti...
متن کاملAdvances in Argumentation-Based Negotiation
Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) is a prevailing approach for automated negotiation. It is based on the exchange of arguments that allow an agent to acquire additional information about the other agents and the particular circumstances of the negotiation, and can be used for attacking or justifying offers. This is an important element in resolving conflicts that very often are due to the a...
متن کاملArgumentation- vs. Proposal-Based Negotiation: An Empirical Case Study on the Basis of Game-Theoretic Solution Concepts
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentationbased negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for co...
متن کاملContract - based Negotiation via Argumentation (
Negotiation is often described as the process by which agents come to a mutually acceptable agreement about some subject. This deenition is quite broad, as this process can be viewed from many diierent angles. Here we consider negotiation from the perspective of contracts. We present a general model of contract-based negotiation and propose a logic programming-based argumentation framework to c...
متن کاملArgumentative alternating offers
This paper presents an argumentative version of the well known alternating offers negotiation protocol. The negotiation mechanism is based on an abstract preference based argumentation framework where both epistemic and practical arguments are taken into consideration in order to decide about different strategic issues. Such issues are the offer that is proposed at each round, acceptance or ref...
متن کامل